The Board
of Downtown Community Ministry decided in June 2001 that it would no
longer seek or accept funds raised through the operation of pokie machines
or other forms of gambling.
Rationale
There is a wide spread of opinion within DCM about the acceptability
of gambling. Some members have strong moral and religious objections,
while others accept some forms of gambling. We are all agreed however,
that the social costs of gambling are high and that acceptance of income
raised through gambling implies an endorsement or even encouragement
of the growing dominance of gambling in New Zealand. We wish to see
the size of the gambling market in New Zealand constrained, and alternative
sources of funding found for the community and voluntary sectors.
In our
view, gambling is very like alcohol. In moderation, it is regarded by
many as a pleasant part of social life. If taken to excess, it can be
damaging for the person involved, his or her family and workplaces.
Like alcohol, and indeed many recreational or illicit drugs, gambling
can become highly addictive. Misuse often results in crime, so the costs
to society often flow onto the justice and prison services, health and
social services. All forms of gambling are inherently risky, but the
so-called continuous games such as pokies pose a greater risk than those
used occasionally.
The Government
actively intervenes to prevent harm from and minimise the costs of alcohol
misuse. In particular, it protects the vulnerable and places considerable
responsibility on operators through liquor licensing and host responsibility
policies. It should take a similar role in relation to gambling, regulating
the behaviour of operators and participants, introducing effective host
responsibility programmes, and allowing the community to make decisions
about the establishment of gambling operations.
Instead,
the New Zealand Government has seemingly embraced gambling as a tool
for economic development and revenue raising. Hard-pressed community
and voluntary groups have become increasingly dependent on the proceeds
of gambling. We are concerned that:
- the
less harmful activities such as Lotto have been widely promoted, as
has the distribution of proceeds to community, sports, welfare and
other groups. This has helped “normalise” the activity
within New Zealand society;
- the
use of gambling for revenue raising is a particularly unjust form
of redistribution, playing as it does on the weak and vulnerable (there
is ample research to back this up), and being a very ineffectual tool
for economic development;
- The
cost of problem gambling is still not well understood or documented.
We believe, however, that it is likely to outweigh the benefits of
activities funded through its proceeds.
We call
upon the Government to regulate the gambling market more rigorously,
to stop stimulating the market, and to work towards funding community
and social agencies from more acceptable sources.
For our
part, we propose to reduce our own dependency on funds from gambling.
As noted above, we no longer seek any funding from organisations that
run gambling services.